ARB Prescribed Exam Workshop Presentation by Graeme Barker
Introduction and Purpose
Speaker: Graham Barker, Deputy Head of Architecture at the University of Nottingham.
Focus: Insights into the ARB (Architects Registration Board) examination process for architecture professionals.
Experience: Over 30 years in practice, 8 years in academia, and 8 years as an ARB examiner.
Key points discussed
1. Overview of the Examination Process
The ARB examination is a rigorous process designed to evaluate both professional competence and academic knowledge.
Candidates are required to demonstrate compliance with 33 specific criteria.
The process is structured similarly to replicating the scope of a three-year degree.
Portfolios must be concise, within a limit of 60-80 pages, and must clearly demonstrate evidence of fulfilling the criteria.
Examiners balance academic and professional perspectives to ensure thorough evaluations.
The exam's structure emphasizes clarity and precision, preparing candidates for real-world application while aligning with academic standards.
2. Evaluation Methodology
Understanding the assessment approach is essential for candidates to tailor their submissions effectively.
Examiners consist of a mix of professionals and academics, ensuring a holistic review of submissions.
Portfolios are evaluated strictly based on the presented evidence; examiners are not allowed to infer competence.
Proper organization and referencing of material are critical for candidates to meet the criteria.
At least 17 criteria must be clearly demonstrated for a candidate to pass the initial stage and qualify for an interview.
This evidence-driven approach underlines the importance of precise, accessible information in portfolio preparation.
3. Portfolio Preparation Tips
To succeed in the ARB examination, candidates must focus on presenting their knowledge and skills in a structured manner.
Organization: Use a logical structure with color-coded references for seamless navigation.
Developmental Work: Include sketches, models, and iterative designs to show critical thinking and progression.
Cross-Referencing: Use a matrix to explicitly connect portfolio elements to the ARB criteria.
Professional Projects: Clearly define personal contributions without exaggeration.
Narrative: Provide concise explanations alongside visual elements to contextualize the evidence and demonstrate understanding.
A well-prepared portfolio is not only an academic exercise but a demonstration of a candidate’s ability to navigate complex design challenges systematically.
4. Common Mistakes
Awareness of common pitfalls can significantly improve the quality and effectiveness of a portfolio.
Overemphasis on final designs at the expense of showcasing the design process and thought development.
Submitting incomplete or poorly referenced portfolios, leading to unclear evidence of meeting criteria.
Failing to meet baseline design skills (GC1), which is a mandatory requirement for progressing.
Overstating roles in professional projects, which raises questions about authenticity and authorship.
Avoiding these common errors can improve a candidate’s chances of advancing to the interview stage and ultimately succeeding in the examination process.
5. The Role of Examiners
Understanding how examiners review and assess portfolios can help candidates align their submissions more effectively.
Examiners conduct individual reviews before meeting to discuss discrepancies.
Evaluations are based on a structured marking form, with criteria marked as “firm positive,” “firm negative,” or “needs discussion.”
Interviews focus on clarifying borderline or insufficiently evidenced criteria, giving candidates an opportunity to address gaps.
The examiner's role is both evaluative and facilitative, aiming to ensure fairness while helping candidates demonstrate their abilities effectively.
Practical advice for candidates
Preparation is key, and aligning with these strategic tips can significantly enhance a candidate's submission.
Strategic Referencing: Use multiple projects or sources to meet each criterion, reducing the risk of weak evidence.
Incorporate Advanced Work: Leverage part three coursework or professional experiences to strengthen the portfolio where applicable.
Show the Process: Highlighting the design journey, including sketches and interim models, demonstrates critical thinking.
Adapt to Local Standards: Address UK-specific requirements, such as building regulations and sustainability, to ensure alignment with ARB expectations.
By focusing on these practical tips, candidates can enhance their portfolios, presenting them as strong reflections of their skills and knowledge.